IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Tait Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Omaha Lancers USHL 56 3 15 18 0.321 0.1976 0.2177 0.9469 1.0431
2013-14 Omaha Lancers USHL 59 16 13 29 0.491 0.3021 0.3187 1.4481 1.5275
2014-15 — USHL 62 14 16 30 0.484 0.2975 0.2992 1.4257 1.4338
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Providence D1 HockeyEast SR 41 1 5 6 0.146
2017-18 Providence D1 HockeyEast JR 29 3 2 5 0.172
2016-17 Providence D1 HockeyEast SO 35 5 4 9 0.257
2015-16 Providence D1 HockeyEast FR 33 5 5 10 0.303
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2015-16 · Providence
+15.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18073
Forward overall
#709
Forward born in 1996
#1815
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Dylan Steman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Christian Lampasso
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Montgomery
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha
0.35 No data
NCAAe PPG
Alex Rauter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Cornell (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jarrid Privitera
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Vermont (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Gallegos
Tufts · 2008-09
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Peters
UMass Boston · 2015-16
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2001-02
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.