IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Gallegos Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-06-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 4 1 4 5 1.250 0.4641 0.4793 1.3235 1.3667
2009-10 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 42 8 7 15 0.357 0.1326 0.1316 0.3781 0.3753
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Tufts D3 NESCAC SR 24 9 4 13 0.542
2012-13 Tufts D3 NESCAC JR 20 11 7 18 0.900
2011-12 Tufts D3 NESCAC SO 19 18 9 27 1.421
2010-11 Tufts D3 NESCAC FR 20 15 8 23 1.150
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.15
2010-11 · Tufts
+396.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30970
Forward overall
#1262
Forward born in 1990
#3732
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Robin Höglund
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tommy Dunleavy
Bowdoin · 2015-16
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Palmiscno
St. John's · 2007-08
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Finlason
UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.