IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick Newell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-01-18 Country: USA
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Indiana Ice USHL 20 3 12 15 0.750 0.4776 0.5173 2.2475 2.4343
2013-14 Indiana Ice USHL 59 13 30 43 0.729 0.4641 0.4810 2.1840 2.2634
2014-15 Penticton Vees BCHL 56 16 31 47 0.839 0.3267 0.3314 1.2240 1.2417
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC SR 39 21 26 47 1.205
2017-18 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC JR 33 6 21 27 0.818
2016-17 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC SO 36 4 20 24 0.667
2015-16 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC FR 37 7 15 22 0.595
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2015-16 · St. Cloud State
+77.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Andrew Poturalski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Schempp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Andrew Faust
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Army (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joe Cox
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Peter Krieger
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Alaska (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Rusty Masters
Elmira · 2004-05
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Congdon
Bryn Athyn · 2015-16
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Krenke
Saint John's · 2022-23
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.