Patrick Newell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-01-18 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2012-13	Indiana Ice	USHL	20	3	12	15	0.750	0.4424	0.4792	2.2526	2.4398
2013-14	Indiana Ice	USHL	59	13	30	43	0.729	0.4299	0.4455	2.1889	2.2685
2014-15	Penticton Vees	BCHL	56	16	31	47	0.839	0.3234	0.3281	1.2214	1.2390
2022-23	Södertälje SK	Allsvenskan	30	3	12	15	0.500	1.2500	1.1494	4.6909	4.3134

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2018-19	St. Cloud State	D1	NCHC	SR	39	21	26	47	1.205
2017-18	St. Cloud State	D1	NCHC	JR	33	6	21	27	0.818
2016-17	St. Cloud State	D1	NCHC	SO	36	4	20	24	0.667
2015-16	St. Cloud State	D1	NCHC	FR	37	7	15	22	0.595

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.32

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.59

2015-16 · St. Cloud State

+85.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

100%

NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm

Neumann · 2003-04

1.800 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Arkhip Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Brandon Osmundson

Utica · 2018-19

1.448 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.