← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Dodero Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-08 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Starbulls Rosenheim · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Chicago Steel USHL 52 5 7 12 0.231 0.1361 0.1501 0.6932 0.7643
2013-14 USHL 49 8 9 17 0.347 0.2046 0.2160 1.0419 1.1000
2014-15 USHL 39 3 8 11 0.282 0.1664 0.1675 0.8473 0.8529
2015-16 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 53 14 21 35 0.660 0.2545 0.2495 0.9611 0.9421
2016-17 Janesville Jets NAHL 41 12 27 39 0.951 0.3495 0.3286 1.0040 0.9438
2023-24 Starbulls Rosenheim DEL2 28 10 12 22 0.786 1.0525 1.0337 1.4099 1.3847
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 American International D1 AHA GR 36 13 16 29 0.806
2020-21 American International D1 AHA SR 19 7 11 18 0.947
2019-20 American International D1 AHA JR 34 3 6 9 0.265
2018-19 American International D1 AHA SO 34 3 11 14 0.412
2017-18 American International D1 AHA FR 11 0 1 1 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2017-18 · American International
-64.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#13450
Forward overall
#538
Forward born in 1996

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2017-18
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2015-16
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nazareth · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.