← New Search ↗ Social Card

Drew Callin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 25 3 3 6 0.240 0.1475 0.1539 0.7071 0.7380
2013-14 Janesville Jets NAHL 56 16 17 33 0.589 0.2335 0.2410 0.6187 0.6387
2014-15 Janesville Jets NAHL 49 18 18 36 0.735 0.2911 0.2852 0.7714 0.7558
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Bentley D1 AHA SR 37 10 25 35 0.946
2017-18 Bentley D1 AHA JR 37 6 20 26 0.703
2016-17 Bentley D1 AHA SO 38 8 11 19 0.500
2015-16 Bentley D1 AHA FR 29 4 6 10 0.345
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.34
2015-16 · Bentley
+50.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22421
Forward overall
#851
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2006-07
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2003-04
1.214 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. John's · 2005-06
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.