IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Mackey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-10-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2012-13 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 38 0 6 6 0.158 0.1006 0.1025 0.4732 0.4822
2013-14 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 51 1 15 16 0.314 0.1998 0.1943 0.9401 0.9141
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Air Force D1 AHA SR 19 2 2 4 0.210
2016-17 Air Force D1 AHA JR 41 2 8 10 0.244
2015-16 Air Force D1 AHA SO 31 2 9 11 0.355
2014-15 Air Force D1 AHA FR 28 2 4 6 0.214
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2014-15 · Air Force
+44.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6443
Defenseman overall
#1054
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nate Repensky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Yale (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trever Hertz
Utica · 2008-09
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Graham Fallon
SUNY Cortland · 2005-06
0.917 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joona Juntunen
Saint Mary's · 2022-23
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.