IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Graham Fallon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-07-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Brockville Braves CCHL 50 10 11 21 0.420 0.0911 0.1013 0.3250 0.3613
2003-04 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 54 16 18 34 0.630 0.1366 0.1450 0.4871 0.5172
2005-06 Cornwall Colts CCHL 36 22 14 36 1.000 0.2169 0.2112 0.7737 0.7534
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC FR 12 6 5 11 0.917
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.92
2007-08 · SUNY Cortland
+479.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22749
Forward overall
#768
Forward born in 1986
#443
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Reuschlein
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kevin Obssuth
Wentworth · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Artem Buzoberya
Hobart · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Shawn Hulshof
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.