IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick Grasso Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-05-29 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Västerås IK · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 17 3 2 5 0.294 0.1735 0.1911 0.8833 0.9727
2013-14 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 59 9 15 24 0.407 0.2400 0.2531 1.2218 1.2883
2014-15 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 60 9 25 34 0.567 0.3343 0.3361 1.7020 1.7110
2015-16 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 60 22 21 43 0.717 0.4228 0.4054 2.1525 2.0638
2024-25 Västerås IK Allsvenskan 10 4 0 4 0.400 1.0000 0.8495 3.7528 3.1881
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SR 23 7 8 15 0.652
2019-20 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast JR 34 13 11 24 0.706
2018-19 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SO 29 7 8 15 0.517
2017-18 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SO 12 2 8 10 0.833
2016-17 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast FR 40 20 13 33 0.825
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.82
2016-17 · New Hampshire
+155.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3245
Forward overall
#183
Forward born in 1996

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.