IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nathan Billitier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-05-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 51 3 5 8 0.157 0.1217 0.1251 0.5840 0.6002
2013-14 — NTDP-U18 53 1 5 6 0.113 0.0878 0.0854 0.4213 0.4099
2014-15 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 30 0 5 5 0.167 0.0967 0.0967 0.4272 0.4270
2015-16 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 53 1 6 7 0.132 0.0767 0.0728 0.3385 0.3214
2016-17 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 61 4 10 14 0.230 0.1332 0.1195 0.5881 0.5278
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Notre Dame D1 — FR 9 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#15966
Defenseman overall
#2058
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colin Phaneuf
St. Scholastica · 2010-11
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Zizek
SUNY Oswego · 2015-16
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Kennedy
Babson · 2021-22
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.