Doyle Somerby Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-07-04 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2012-13	Muskegon Lumberjacks	USHL	10	2	0	2	0.200	0.1229	0.1236	0.5892	0.5928
2022-23	Shanghai Dragons	KHL	63	2	9	11	0.175	0.4365	0.3960	—	—
2023-24	Shanghai Dragons	KHL	59	2	10	12	0.203	0.5085	0.4328	—	—
2024-25	Shanghai Dragons	KHL	52	5	9	14	0.269	0.6730	0.5530	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2016-17	Boston University	D1	HockeyEast	—	39	1	2	3	0.077
2015-16	Boston University	D1	HockeyEast	—	39	5	8	13	0.333
2014-15	Boston University	D1	HockeyEast	—	39	1	6	7	0.179
2013-14	Boston University	D1	HockeyEast	—	34	1	3	4	0.118

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.12

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.12

2013-14 · Boston University

0.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

90%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#926

Defenseman overall

#224

Defenseman born in 1994

D2/3 Comparables

Steve Schroeder

Norwich · 2006-07

0.742 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

Richard McCartney

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15

0.923 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

Alex Botten

SUNY Oswego · 2010-11

1.133 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.