IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Hutchison Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-27 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
EV Landshut · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Tri-City Storm USHL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.1180 0.1235 0.6007 0.6288
2013-14 Tri-City Storm USHL 32 2 2 4 0.125 0.0737 0.0737 0.3754 0.3754
2014-15 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 26 7 3 10 0.385 0.1482 0.1449 0.5597 0.5474
2015-16 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 37 16 26 42 1.135 0.4374 0.4043 1.6519 1.5271
2023-24 — Allsvenskan 30 13 4 17 0.567 1.4167 1.2129 5.3167 4.5518
2024-25 EV Landshut DEL2 22 12 13 25 1.136 1.5223 1.3321 2.0392 1.7844
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Canisius D1 AHA SR 31 18 14 32 1.032
2018-19 Canisius D1 AHA JR 34 13 13 26 0.765
2017-18 Canisius D1 AHA SO 38 16 15 31 0.816
2016-17 Canisius D1 AHA FR 37 13 11 24 0.649
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2016-17 · Canisius
+152.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#2514
Forward overall
#144
Forward born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

Arvega Hovsepyan
Salve Regina · 2023-24
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Coffman
Utica · 2023-24
1.480 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Quinn Waller
Adrian · 2006-07
1.586 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.