IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Hutchison Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-27 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
EV Landshut · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Tri-City Storm USHL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.1274 0.1334 0.5993 0.6273
2013-14 Tri-City Storm USHL 32 2 2 4 0.125 0.0796 0.0796 0.3746 0.3746
2014-15 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 26 7 3 10 0.385 0.1497 0.1464 0.5609 0.5485
2015-16 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 37 16 26 42 1.135 0.4418 0.4084 1.6553 1.5302
2024-25 EV Landshut DEL2 22 12 13 25 1.136 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Canisius D1 AHA SR 31 18 14 32 1.032
2018-19 Canisius D1 AHA JR 34 13 13 26 0.765
2017-18 Canisius D1 AHA SO 38 16 15 31 0.816
2016-17 Canisius D1 AHA FR 37 13 11 24 0.649
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2016-17 · Canisius
+149.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13109
Forward overall
#463
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Cox
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Hechter
Saint Anselm · 2002-03
1.375 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Miller
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.