IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shane Gersich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-07-10 Country: USA
2014 · Round 5, Pick #134  ·  Washington Capitals Washington Capitals
Signed Professionally
Iserlohn Roosters · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Omaha Lancers USHL 6 1 0 1 0.167 0.0983 0.1088 0.5007 0.5543
2013-14 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 61 16 16 32 0.525 0.3899 0.3821 1.9575 1.9182
2014-15 Omaha Lancers USHL 52 27 23 50 0.962 0.5672 0.5734 2.8878 2.9196
2023-24 Västerås IK Allsvenskan 48 19 13 32 0.667 1.6667 1.5273 6.2549 5.7319
2024-25 Iserlohn Roosters DEL 51 16 21 37 0.726 1.8138 1.8417 6.1509 6.2457
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 North Dakota D1 NCHC JR 40 13 16 29 0.725
2016-17 North Dakota D1 NCHC SO 40 21 16 37 0.925
2015-16 North Dakota D1 NCHC FR 37 9 2 11 0.297
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.43
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2015-16 · North Dakota
-30.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#1427
Forward overall
#80
Forward born in 1996

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.