| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Omaha Lancers | USHL | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.167 | 0.1062 | 0.1176 | 0.4995 | 0.5529 |
| 2013-14 | U.S. National U18 Team | NTDP-U18 | 61 | 16 | 16 | 32 | 0.525 | 0.4173 | 0.4089 | 1.9647 | 1.9253 |
| 2014-15 | Omaha Lancers | USHL | 52 | 27 | 23 | 50 | 0.962 | 0.6123 | 0.6190 | 2.8813 | 2.9130 |
| 2023-24 | Västerås IK | Allsvenskan | 48 | 19 | 13 | 32 | 0.667 | — | — | — | — |
| 2024-25 | Iserlohn Roosters | DEL | 51 | 16 | 21 | 37 | 0.726 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | North Dakota | D1 | NCHC | JR | 40 | 13 | 16 | 29 | 0.725 |
| 2016-17 | North Dakota | D1 | NCHC | SO | 40 | 21 | 16 | 37 | 0.925 |
| 2015-16 | North Dakota | D1 | NCHC | FR | 37 | 9 | 2 | 11 | 0.297 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.