← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ruslan Pedan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-11-16 Country: Russia
Signed Professionally
Vityaz Moscow Region · KHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 42 1 7 8 0.191 0.0700 0.0779 0.2011 0.2239
2012-13 Janesville Jets NAHL 44 11 22 33 0.750 0.2756 0.2930 1.0010 1.0256
2016-17 HK Sochi KHL 33 0 3 3 0.091 0.2272 0.2856 1.2525 1.5746
2017-18 HK Sochi KHL 22 1 1 2 0.091 0.2272 0.2759 1.2525 1.5210
2018-19 KHL 11 0 1 1 0.091 0.2272 0.2658 1.2525 1.4655
2019-20 Spartak Moskva KHL 10 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Shanghai Dragons KHL 36 1 6 7 0.194 0.4860 0.4860 2.6786 2.6786
2021-22 Amur Khabarovsk KHL 39 4 5 9 0.231 0.5770 0.5804 3.1801 3.1987
2022-23 Amur Khabarovsk KHL 48 2 7 9 0.188 0.4688 0.4339 2.5835 2.3914
2023-24 Vityaz Moscow Region KHL 59 7 12 19 0.322 0.8050 0.7001 4.4367 3.8586
2024-25 Vityaz Moscow Region KHL 41 1 7 8 0.195 0.4878 0.4098 2.6882 2.2585
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Bemidji State D1 WCHA JR 39 3 6 9 0.231
2014-15 Bemidji State D1 WCHA SO 38 3 7 10 0.263
2013-14 Bemidji State D1 WCHA FR 38 3 10 13 0.342
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.34
2013-14 · Bemidji State
+75.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#879
Defenseman overall
#219
Defenseman born in 1994

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2024-25
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2014-15
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.