IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Nanne Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-03-17 Country: USA
2014 · Round 5, Pick #142  ·  New York Rangers New York Rangers
Signed Professionally
IF Björklöven · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Lincoln Stars USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 4 0 2 2 0.500 0.2949 0.3080 1.5017 1.5685
2014-15 — USHL 43 8 8 16 0.372 0.2195 0.2185 1.1176 1.1123
2021-22 Sport Liiga 7 1 1 2 0.286 0.7143 0.7037 2.4559 2.4195
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Minnesota D1 BigTen SR 35 4 10 14 0.400
2018-19 Minnesota D1 BigTen JR 38 5 8 13 0.342
2017-18 Minnesota D1 BigTen SO 37 4 6 10 0.270
2016-17 Minnesota D1 BigTen — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Ohio State D1 BigTen — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5398
Defenseman overall
#970
Defenseman born in 1996

D2/3 Comparables

Jason Kalinowski
Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Yuel
Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Ford
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.