← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendon Kearney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 6 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Chicago Steel USHL 43 1 18 19 0.442 0.2607 0.2590 1.3272 1.3188
2014-15 Chicago Steel USHL 57 18 14 32 0.561 0.3312 0.3128 1.6861 1.5925
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Ohio State D1 BigTen SR 36 7 4 11 0.306
2017-18 Ohio State D1 BigTen JR 41 5 13 18 0.439
2016-17 Ohio State D1 BigTen SO 33 3 7 10 0.303
2015-16 Ohio State D1 BigTen FR 27 4 5 9 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2015-16 · Ohio State
+31.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20979
Forward overall
#780
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2007-08
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2018-19
1.409 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.