IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Scott Conway Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-09 Country: England
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Texas Tornado NAHL 57 18 36 54 0.947 0.3518 0.3810 1.0031 1.0863
2013-14 Indiana Ice USHL 57 33 35 68 1.193 0.7597 0.7578 3.5751 3.5662
2015-16 Penticton Vees BCHL 56 56 60 116 2.071 0.8062 0.7433 3.0207 2.7850
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Providence D1 HockeyEast SR 42 15 14 29 0.691
2017-18 Providence D1 HockeyEast JR 39 13 10 23 0.590
2016-17 Providence D1 HockeyEast SO 38 12 11 23 0.605
2014-15 Penn State D1 BigTen FR 34 10 16 26 0.765
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.57
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.76
2014-15 · Penn State
+35.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#689
Forward overall
#23
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Mike Szmatula
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.70 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Novak
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.70 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sam Anas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.60 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Conor Landrigan
Utica · 2016-17
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Joona Juntunen
Saint Mary's · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Ellis
SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.