IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maxim Letunov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-02-20 Country: Russia
Signed Professionally
Torpedo Nizhny Novgorod · KHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 60 19 24 43 0.717 0.4228 0.4401 2.1115 2.1978
2014-15 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 58 25 39 64 1.103 0.6509 0.6455 3.2508 3.2238
2022-23 Torpedo Nizhny Novgorod KHL 62 16 14 30 0.484 1.2098 1.1962 — —
2023-24 Torpedo Nizhny Novgorod KHL 66 25 23 48 0.727 1.8182 1.6960 — —
2024-25 Torpedo Nizhny Novgorod KHL 68 13 25 38 0.559 1.3970 1.2619 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 UConn D1 HockeyEast JR 36 12 16 28 0.778
2016-17 UConn D1 HockeyEast SO 33 7 20 27 0.818
2015-16 UConn D1 HockeyEast FR 36 16 24 40 1.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.52
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.11
2015-16 · UConn
+111.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#468
Forward overall
#26
Forward born in 1996

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.