IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Andrew Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-04-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 51 20 23 43 0.843 0.3130 0.3239 0.8927 0.9237
2013-14 Indiana Ice USHL 47 10 14 24 0.511 0.3252 0.3087 1.5301 1.4525
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Ferris State D1 WCHA SR 25 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Ferris State D1 WCHA JR 25 3 2 5 0.200
2015-16 Ferris State D1 WCHA SO 35 3 5 8 0.229
2014-15 Ferris State D1 WCHA FR 29 3 5 8 0.276
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2014-15 · Ferris State
+2.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9142
Forward overall
#376
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Devin Loe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Bauman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Foster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jason Cassells
Elmira · 2000-01
0.955 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michel Bond
SUNY Geneseo · 2000-01
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Conlan Keenan
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.