IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Bauman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-04-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 60 26 16 42 0.700 0.2599 0.2557 0.7412 0.7291
2013-14 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 58 21 20 41 0.707 0.2625 0.2451 0.7485 0.6988
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Bemidji State D1 WCHA SR 38 9 21 30 0.789
2016-17 Bemidji State D1 WCHA JR 41 13 10 23 0.561
2015-16 Bemidji State D1 WCHA SO 39 7 13 20 0.513
2014-15 Bemidji State D1 WCHA FR 30 8 8 16 0.533
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2014-15 · Bemidji State
+149.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13503
Forward overall
#494
Forward born in 1993
#875
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jordan Carvalho
Morrisville · 2012-13
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Colton Alexander
Canton · 2024-25
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Danny Bosio
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.