IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Clint Carlisle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-05-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 49 10 25 35 0.714 0.2652 0.2625 0.7563 0.7485
2012-13 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 32 16 9 25 0.781 0.2901 0.2726 0.8271 0.7771
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Army D1 AHA SR 12 2 3 5 0.417
2015-16 Army D1 AHA JR 37 7 10 17 0.460
2014-15 Army D1 AHA SO 34 3 11 14 0.412
2013-14 Army D1 AHA FR 33 7 10 17 0.515
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2013-14 · Army
+124.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12013
Forward overall
#527
Forward born in 1992
#682
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ty Kraus
Northland · 2015-16
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Noel Lortie
Elmira · 2005-06
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jarrett Cammarata
Bethel · 2018-19
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.