IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bradley Duwe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-05-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 47 16 18 34 0.723 0.2686 0.2919 0.7659 0.8323
2010-11 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 50 17 33 50 1.000 0.3713 0.3846 1.0588 1.0966
2012-13 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 26 8 9 17 0.654 0.2428 0.2273 0.6922 0.6480
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SR 22 4 1 5 0.227
2015-16 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA JR 31 7 2 9 0.290
2014-15 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SO 28 4 6 10 0.357
2013-14 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA FR 27 7 1 8 0.296
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2013-14 · Alaska Anchorage
+19.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11272
Forward overall
#492
Forward born in 1992
#578
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mark Menzies
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Francone
Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Giorgio
Bethel · 2018-19
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.