IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cody Marooney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-07-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 58 9 14 23 0.397 0.1473 0.1539 0.4199 0.4387
2011-12 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 50 4 4 8 0.160 0.1019 0.0978 0.4795 0.4602
2012-13 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 37 6 18 24 0.649 0.2408 0.2276 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Alabama-Huntsville D1 — SR 25 1 2 3 0.120
2015-16 Alabama-Huntsville D1 — JR 31 4 2 6 0.194
2014-15 Alabama-Huntsville D1 — SO 36 3 3 6 0.167
2013-14 Alabama-Huntsville D1 — FR 38 2 2 4 0.105
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2013-14 · Alabama-Huntsville
-30.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23586
Forward overall
#1028
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Robin Höglund
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vince Perreault
Westfield State · 2008-09
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Zeke Hume
Manhattanville · 2002-03
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Vilho Saariluoma
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2018-19
1.300 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.