| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Toronto Dixie Beehives | OJHL | 48 | 10 | 18 | 28 | 0.583 | 0.1630 | 0.1712 | 0.4025 | 0.4228 |
| 2010-11 | Brampton Capitals | OJHL | 23 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 0.565 | 0.1579 | 0.1585 | 0.3900 | 0.3915 |
| 2011-12 | Caledon Admirals | OJHL | 28 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 0.536 | 0.1497 | 0.1437 | 0.3697 | 0.3548 |
| 2012-13 | — | OJHL | 53 | 16 | 28 | 44 | 0.830 | 0.2320 | 0.2111 | 0.5729 | 0.5213 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Morrisville | D3 | SUNYAC | SR | 25 | 6 | 31 | 37 | 1.480 |
| 2015-16 | Morrisville | D3 | SUNYAC | JR | 24 | 6 | 19 | 25 | 1.042 |
| 2014-15 | Morrisville | D3 | SUNYAC | SO | 24 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 0.708 |
| 2013-14 | Morrisville | D3 | SUNYAC | FR | 24 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 0.833 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.