← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Carvalho Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-04-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Toronto Dixie Beehives OJHL 48 10 18 28 0.583 0.1630 0.1712 0.4025 0.4228
2010-11 Brampton Capitals OJHL 23 6 7 13 0.565 0.1579 0.1585 0.3900 0.3915
2011-12 Caledon Admirals OJHL 28 6 9 15 0.536 0.1497 0.1437 0.3697 0.3548
2012-13 OJHL 53 16 28 44 0.830 0.2320 0.2111 0.5729 0.5213
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SR 25 6 31 37 1.480
2015-16 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC JR 24 6 19 25 1.042
2014-15 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SO 24 7 10 17 0.708
2013-14 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC FR 24 8 12 20 0.833
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.83
2013-14 · Morrisville
+428.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21647
Forward overall
#940
Forward born in 1992
#1682
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Williams · 2003-04
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.