← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Carvalho Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-04-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Toronto Dixie Beehives OJHL 48 10 18 28 0.583 0.1430 0.1502 0.4016 0.4219
2010-11 Brampton Capitals OJHL 23 6 7 13 0.565 0.1385 0.1390 0.3891 0.3906
2011-12 Caledon Admirals OJHL 28 6 9 15 0.536 0.1313 0.1260 0.3688 0.3539
2012-13 OJHL 53 16 28 44 0.830 0.2035 0.1852 0.5716 0.5201
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SR 25 6 31 37 1.480
2015-16 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC JR 24 6 19 25 1.042
2014-15 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SO 24 7 10 17 0.708
2013-14 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC FR 24 8 12 20 0.833
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.83
2013-14 · SUNY Morrisville
+502.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27982
Forward overall
#1046
Forward born in 1992
#1383
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Middlebury · 2024-25
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.