Trey Bradley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-05-06 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2013-14	Youngstown Phantoms	USHL	32	7	14	21	0.656	0.3871	0.4069	1.9708	2.0718
2014-15	—	USHL	55	4	26	30	0.545	0.3218	0.3225	1.6384	1.6419
2022-23	Östersunds IK	Allsvenskan	9	3	3	6	0.667	1.6667	1.5574	6.2549	5.8448

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2018-19	Colorado College	D1	NCHC	—	41	15	19	34	0.829
2017-18	Colorado College	D1	NCHC	—	37	7	24	31	0.838
2016-17	Colorado College	D1	NCHC	—	9	0	6	6	0.667
2015-16	Colorado College	D1	NCHC	—	33	9	7	16	0.485

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.30

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.48

2015-16 · Colorado College

+59.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

100%

NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#10345

Forward overall

#425

Forward born in 1996

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm

Neumann · 2003-04

1.800 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Arkhip Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Brandon Osmundson

Utica · 2018-19

1.448 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.