IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick Curry Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-01-09 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
KalPa · Liiga

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Tri-City Storm USHL 32 4 9 13 0.406 0.2396 0.2480 1.2200 1.2628
2014-15 Central Illinois Flying Aces USHL 55 9 11 20 0.364 0.2145 0.2115 1.0920 1.0767
2015-16 Central Illinois Flying Aces USHL 60 17 16 33 0.550 0.3244 0.3048 1.6519 1.5520
2024-25 KalPa Liiga 60 29 31 60 1.000 2.5000 2.2177 8.5961 7.6253
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 34 19 13 32 0.941
2018-19 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 38 13 13 26 0.684
2017-18 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 30 4 6 10 0.333
2016-17 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 39 3 8 11 0.282
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2016-17 · Boston University
+23.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#769
Forward overall
#45
Forward born in 1996

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.