Jack Dougherty Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-05-25 Country: USA

2014 · Round 2, Pick #51 ·

Nashville Predators

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2013-14	U.S. National U18 Team	NTDP-U18	57	7	14	21	0.368	0.2738	0.2666	1.3746	1.3384
2015-16	Portland Winterhawks	WHL	68	11	41	52	0.765	0.3720	0.3537	1.8763	1.7841
2022-23	Kölner Haie	DEL	2	0	0	0	0.000	—	—	—	—
2023-24	Nürnberg Ice Tigers	DEL	29	2	9	11	0.379	0.9483	1.0005	3.2158	3.3928

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2014-15	Wisconsin	D1	BigTen	FR	33	2	7	9	0.273

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.25

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.27

2014-15 · Wisconsin

+8.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

100%

NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#2030

Defenseman overall

#423

Defenseman born in 1996

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm

Neumann · 2003-04

1.800 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Arkhip Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Brandon Osmundson

Utica · 2018-19

1.448 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.