IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Grant Gabriele Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-04-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 27 3 9 12 0.444 0.3303 0.3364 1.6582 1.6888
2014-15 — NTDP-U18 59 4 13 17 0.288 0.2141 0.2077 1.0750 1.0427
2015-16 — USHL 62 9 17 26 0.419 0.2474 0.2481 1.2596 1.2634
2016-17 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 34 4 16 20 0.588 0.3470 0.3303 1.7666 1.6818
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Ohio State D1 BigTen GR 37 5 15 20 0.540
2020-21 Ohio State D1 BigTen SR 27 3 10 13 0.481
2019-20 Ohio State D1 BigTen JR 36 4 9 13 0.361
2018-19 Ohio State D1 BigTen SO 24 1 3 4 0.167
2017-18 Ohio State D1 BigTen — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#3783
Defenseman overall
#819
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Connor Murphy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jared Kolquist
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Newell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Busby
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.903 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Armour
Adrian · 2013-14
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Leone
Utica · 2007-08
1.462 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.