IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ty Pelton-Byce Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-04-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.2949 0.3239 1.5017 1.6492
2015-16 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 60 15 28 43 0.717 0.4228 0.4239 2.1525 2.1581
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SR 24 12 19 31 1.292
2019-20 Wisconsin D1 BigTen JR 32 9 15 24 0.750
2017-18 Harvard D1 ECAC SO 33 10 15 25 0.758
2016-17 Harvard D1 ECAC FR 33 1 7 8 0.242
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2016-17 · Harvard
-26.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7611
Forward overall
#351
Forward born in 1997
#576
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Drew Smolcynski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Average
NCAAe PPG
Daniel Milne
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Michigan
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ray Pigozzi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ UMass (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
John Stevens
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Hawkins
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Stevens
Plymouth State · 2012-13
1.444 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Signoretti
Buffalo State · 2022-23
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nolan Redler
UMass Boston · 2015-16
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.