IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Lee Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-04-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Tri-City Storm USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 Penticton Vees BCHL 56 2 34 36 0.643 0.2477 0.2546 0.9368 0.9629
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SR 33 5 28 33 1.000
2018-19 Sacred Heart D1 AHA JR 35 4 15 19 0.543
2016-17 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SO 15 0 3 3 0.200
2015-16 Vermont D1 HockeyEast FR 36 1 2 3 0.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2015-16 · Vermont
-65.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4736
Defenseman overall
#894
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Jeff Taylor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Union (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Benning
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jaccob Slavin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Gavin Bayreuther
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.95 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Renouf
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Maine (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cam Boche
Saint John's · 2020-21
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Miller
UMass Dartmouth · 2016-17
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Marinac
SUNY Brockport · 2010-11
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.