icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-14 | Fargo Force | USHL | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2014-15 | — | USHL | 55 | 2 | 19 | 21 | 0.382 | 0.2252 | 0.2320 | 1.1467 | 1.1813 |
| 2016-17 | Waterloo Black Hawks | USHL | 29 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 0.414 | 0.2441 | 0.2277 | 1.2428 | 1.1591 |
| 2018-19 | Brock Univ. | USports-M | 21 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 0.476 | 0.2512 | 0.2635 | 1.3957 | 1.4643 |
| 2019-20 | Brock Univ. | USports-M | 10 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.400 | 0.2110 | 0.2110 | 1.1724 | 1.1724 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Merrimack | D1 | HockeyEast | SO | 14 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.286 |
| 2015-16 | Merrimack | D1 | HockeyEast | FR | 34 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.118 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.