IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Rey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-04-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Winnipeg Saints MJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2007-08 Nipawin Hawks SJHL 56 5 13 18 0.321 0.0823 0.0849 0.2382 0.2457
2008-09 Nipawin Hawks SJHL 54 25 20 45 0.833 0.2135 0.2096 0.6176 0.6063
2009-10 — SJHL 57 27 51 78 1.368 0.3506 0.3281 1.0141 0.9490
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SR 27 15 12 27 1.000
2012-13 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — JR 12 3 2 5 0.417
2011-12 Neumann D3 MAC — 26 4 19 23 0.885
2010-11 Neumann D3 MAC — 28 15 15 30 1.071
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.07
2010-11 · Neumann
+345.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16380
Forward overall
#557
Forward born in 1989

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cam Doull
Lake Forest · 2002-03
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Belger
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Williams
Marian · 2008-09
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.