IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

A.J. Tucker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-01-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 14 0 3 3 0.214 0.0525 0.0558 0.1475 0.1569
2003-04 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 44 13 21 34 0.773 0.1487 0.1428 0.4873 0.4679
2004-05 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 62 27 55 82 1.323 0.2546 0.2324 0.8340 0.7613
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 27 16 15 31 1.148
2007-08 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 28 15 17 32 1.143
2006-07 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 29 10 16 26 0.897
2005-06 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 27 9 21 30 1.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.11
2005-06 · St. Scholastica
+560.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22084
Forward overall
#652
Forward born in 1984

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Logan Lemirande
Lawrence · 2011-12
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Glynn Robitaille
Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Keyes
Aurora · 2018-19
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.