Troy Loggins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-07-21 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2013-14	Wenatchee Wild	NAHL	60	23	30	53	0.883	0.3245	0.3397	0.9323	0.9760
2014-15	Sioux Falls Stampede	USHL	57	14	21	35	0.614	0.3622	0.3486	1.8441	1.7748
2022-23	Västerviks IK	Allsvenskan	27	9	5	14	0.518	1.2962	1.1598	4.8645	4.3524

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2018-19	Northern Michigan	D1	WCHA	SR	39	23	17	40	1.026
2017-18	Northern Michigan	D1	WCHA	JR	43	23	24	47	1.093
2016-17	Northern Michigan	D1	WCHA	SO	38	10	6	16	0.421
2015-16	Northern Michigan	D1	WCHA	FR	16	0	3	3	0.188

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.30

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.19

2015-16 · Northern Michigan

-36.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

100%

NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#2388

Forward overall

#139

Forward born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm

Neumann · 2003-04

1.800 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Arkhip Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Brandon Osmundson

Utica · 2018-19

1.448 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.