IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charlie Gerard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-11-19 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Nürnberg Ice Tigers · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Madison Capitols USHL 60 17 16 33 0.550 0.3244 0.3176 1.6519 1.6171
2015-16 — USHL 61 19 14 33 0.541 0.3191 0.2976 1.6248 1.5151
2023-24 Nürnberg Ice Tigers DEL 52 14 19 33 0.635 1.5865 1.6330 5.3803 5.5379
2024-25 Nürnberg Ice Tigers DEL 51 13 13 26 0.510 1.2745 1.2533 4.3222 4.2503
2025-26 Nürnberg Ice Tigers DEL 49 10 18 28 0.571 1.4285 1.4717 4.8444 4.9908
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Minnesota State D1 WCHA SR 37 13 17 30 0.811
2018-19 Minnesota State D1 WCHA JR 42 12 18 30 0.714
2017-18 Minnesota State D1 WCHA SO 14 2 3 5 0.357
2016-17 Minnesota State D1 WCHA FR 28 3 2 5 0.179
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2016-17 · Minnesota State
-31.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#3806
Forward overall
#224
Forward born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.