| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Jungadler Mannheim U18 | DNL | 34 | 2 | 11 | 13 | 0.382 | 0.0590 | 0.0637 | 0.2474 | 0.2671 |
| 2012-13 | Jungadler Mannheim U18 | DNL | 34 | 27 | 34 | 61 | 1.794 | 0.2767 | 0.2858 | 1.1608 | 1.1991 |
| 2013-14 | Jungadler Mannheim U18 | DNL | 36 | 28 | 37 | 65 | 1.806 | 0.2784 | 0.2649 | 1.1682 | 1.1117 |
| 2014-15 | Green Bay Gamblers | USHL | 32 | 15 | 8 | 23 | 0.719 | 0.4418 | 0.4258 | 2.1177 | 2.0411 |
| 2015-16 | Green Bay Gamblers | USHL | 59 | 10 | 41 | 51 | 0.864 | 0.5313 | 0.4874 | 2.5467 | 2.3361 |
| 2024-25 | Adler Mannheim | DEL | 52 | 12 | 19 | 31 | 0.596 | 0.6520 | 0.6312 | — | — |
| 2025-26 | Adler Mannheim | DEL | 52 | 11 | 31 | 42 | 0.808 | 0.8833 | 0.8966 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Minnesota | D1 | BigTen | — | 31 | 20 | 24 | 44 | 1.419 |
| 2019-20 | Minnesota State | D1 | WCHA | SR | 31 | 20 | 24 | 44 | 1.419 |
| 2018-19 | Minnesota | D1 | BigTen | — | 42 | 19 | 23 | 42 | 1.000 |
| 2018-19 | Minnesota State | D1 | WCHA | JR | 42 | 19 | 23 | 42 | 1.000 |
| 2017-18 | Minnesota | D1 | BigTen | — | 36 | 18 | 22 | 40 | 1.111 |
| 2017-18 | Minnesota State | D1 | WCHA | SO | 36 | 18 | 22 | 40 | 1.111 |
| 2016-17 | Minnesota | D1 | BigTen | — | 39 | 14 | 22 | 36 | 0.923 |
| 2016-17 | Minnesota State | D1 | WCHA | FR | 39 | 14 | 22 | 36 | 0.923 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.