IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marc Michaelis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-07-31 Country: Germany
Signed Professionally
Adler Mannheim · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Jungadler Mannheim U18 DNL 34 2 11 13 0.382 0.0590 0.0637 0.2455 0.2651
2012-13 Jungadler Mannheim U18 DNL 34 27 34 61 1.794 0.2770 0.2861 1.1516 1.1896
2013-14 Jungadler Mannheim U18 DNL 36 28 37 65 1.806 0.2788 0.2653 1.1590 1.1029
2014-15 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 32 15 8 23 0.719 0.4240 0.4087 2.1588 2.0807
2015-16 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 59 10 41 51 0.864 0.5099 0.4677 2.5961 2.3814
2024-25 Adler Mannheim DEL 52 12 19 31 0.596 1.4905 1.4430 5.0547 4.8937
2025-26 Adler Mannheim DEL 52 11 31 42 0.808 2.0192 2.0495 6.8478 6.9506
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Minnesota State D1 WCHA SR 31 20 24 44 1.419
2018-19 Minnesota State D1 WCHA JR 42 19 23 42 1.000
2017-18 Minnesota State D1 WCHA SO 36 18 22 40 1.111
2016-17 Minnesota State D1 WCHA FR 39 14 22 36 0.923
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.38
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.92
2016-17 · Minnesota State
+142.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#2802
Forward overall
#160
Forward born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.