Patrick Khodorenko Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-10-13 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2014-15	U.S. National U17 Team	NTDP-U18	55	13	20	33	0.600	0.4460	0.4658	2.2388	2.3384
2015-16	U.S. National U18 Team	NTDP-U18	43	7	6	13	0.302	0.2247	0.2241	1.1280	1.1252
2024-25	Lukko	Liiga	60	15	19	34	0.567	1.4167	1.4521	4.8714	4.9933

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2019-20	Michigan State	D1	BigTen	SR	36	16	17	33	0.917
2018-19	Michigan State	D1	BigTen	JR	36	18	19	37	1.028
2017-18	Michigan State	D1	BigTen	SO	36	13	19	32	0.889
2016-17	Michigan State	D1	BigTen	FR	35	7	11	18	0.514

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.27

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.51

2016-17 · Michigan State

+87.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

100%

NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm

Neumann · 2003-04

1.800 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Arkhip Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Brandon Osmundson

Utica · 2018-19

1.448 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.