icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
Edmonton Oilers
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | — | SHL-J20 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2013-14 | — | SHL-J20 | 44 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 0.455 | 0.2526 | 0.2632 | 0.6056 | 0.6311 |
| 2014-15 | — | USHL | 52 | 2 | 14 | 16 | 0.308 | 0.1815 | 0.1800 | 0.9241 | 0.9167 |
| 2017-18 | — | SHL | 49 | 1 | 12 | 13 | 0.265 | 0.6632 | 0.8067 | 3.4618 | 4.2111 |
| 2020-21 | — | Allsvenskan | 14 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 0.857 | 2.1427 | 2.1427 | 8.0412 | 8.0412 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | UMass | D1 | HockeyEast | SO | 36 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0.222 |
| 2015-16 | UMass | D1 | HockeyEast | FR | 27 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.259 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.