← New Search ↗ Social Card

Wade Allison Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-10-14 Country: Canada
2016 · Round 2, Pick #52  ·  Philadelphia Flyers Philadelphia Flyers
Signed Professionally
Barys Astana · KHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Tri-City Storm USHL 35 6 7 13 0.371 0.2191 0.2353 1.1155 1.1982
2015-16 Tri-City Storm USHL 56 25 22 47 0.839 0.4951 0.5088 2.5208 2.5905
2024-25 Barys Astana KHL 12 2 0 2 0.167 0.4167 0.4107 2.2969 2.2640
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SR 26 10 13 23 0.885
2018-19 Western Michigan D1 NCHC JR 22 8 7 15 0.682
2017-18 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SO 22 15 15 30 1.364
2016-17 Western Michigan D1 NCHC FR 36 12 17 29 0.806
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.81
2016-17 · Western Michigan
+135.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2024-25
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2014-15
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.