IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Pastujov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-01-21 Country: USA
2016 · Round 7, Pick #193  ·  New York Islanders New York Islanders
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 45 13 17 30 0.667 0.4956 0.4997 2.4877 2.5081
2015-16 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 60 13 8 21 0.350 0.2602 0.2501 1.3060 1.2554
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Michigan D1 BigTen SR 36 9 9 18 0.500
2018-19 Michigan D1 BigTen JR 36 11 13 24 0.667
2017-18 Michigan D1 BigTen SO 36 4 11 15 0.417
2016-17 Michigan D1 BigTen FR 28 1 2 3 0.107
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2016-17 · Michigan
-64.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21715
Forward overall
#1050
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Drew Melanson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ RPI (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Garrett Gamez
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Providence (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Andrew Oglevie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siroky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Evans
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bailey Conger
UMass Boston · 2014-15
2.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Tyrie
Worcester State · 2022-23
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jon Whitelaw
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.