IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Evans Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-02-18 Country: Canada
2014 · Round 7, Pick #207  ·  Montreal Canadiens Montreal Canadiens
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Erie Otters OHL 67 12 11 23 0.343 0.1986 0.2160 0.8821 0.9592
2012-13 Erie Otters OHL 56 5 11 16 0.286 0.1653 0.1715 0.7341 0.7615
2013-14 Erie Otters OHL 57 11 7 18 0.316 0.1827 0.1802 0.8114 0.8002
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SR 40 13 33 46 1.150
2016-17 Notre Dame D1 BigTen JR 40 13 29 42 1.050
2015-16 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SO 37 8 25 33 0.892
2014-15 Notre Dame D1 BigTen FR 41 7 10 17 0.415
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2014-15 · Notre Dame
+174.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31377
Forward overall
#1257
Forward born in 1995
#1083
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Mason Jobst
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Maucieri
St. Thomas · 2017-18
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aidan Connolly
Salve Regina · 2019-20
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tommy Carls
Augsburg · 2019-20
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.