IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tommy Carls Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-01-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Centennial USHS-MN 27 10 26 36 1.333 0.1688 0.1688 0.3239 0.3239
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Hamline D3 MIAC — 25 11 7 18 0.720
2023-24 Augsburg D3 MIAC SR 21 3 0 3 0.143
2022-23 Augsburg D3 MIAC JR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Augsburg D3 MIAC SO 24 2 3 5 0.208
2020-21 Augsburg D1 MIAC FR 5 2 1 3 0.600
2020-21 Augsburg D3 MIAC FR 5 2 1 3 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2020-21 · Augsburg
+315.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
75%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11548
Forward overall
#559
Forward born in 2002
#355
in USHS-MN

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Bandazian
Skidmore · 2005-06
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Hall
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2010-11
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Salmon
SUNY Morrisville · 2006-07
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.