IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeff Kubiak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-01-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Chicago Steel USHL 54 12 14 26 0.481 0.2960 0.3068 1.4186 1.4703
2012-13 — USHL 55 8 10 18 0.327 0.2012 0.1978 0.9643 0.9481
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Cornell D1 ECAC SR 25 3 14 17 0.680
2015-16 Cornell D1 ECAC JR 34 10 17 27 0.794
2014-15 Cornell D1 ECAC SO 27 1 7 8 0.296
2013-14 Cornell D1 ECAC FR 30 1 8 9 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2013-14 · Cornell
+45.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22409
Forward overall
#876
Forward born in 1994
#2235
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Blake Winiecki
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mason Jobst
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

George Thurston
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Marlon Gardner
Neumann · 2005-06
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Bartfield
Skidmore · 2022-23
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.