← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brian Sanzone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-12-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Northern Cyclones EHL 39 6 8 14 0.359 0.1263 0.1306 0.1760 0.1820
2017-18 Northern Cyclones NCDC 50 9 20 29 0.580 0.3234 0.3142 0.4690 0.4556
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Colby D3 NESCAC SR 22 5 5 10 0.455
2020-21 Colby D1 JR 4 1 2 3 0.750
2020-21 Colby D3 NESCAC JR 4 1 2 3 0.750
2019-20 Colby D1 SO 7 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Colby D3 NESCAC SO 7 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Colby D1 FR 13 3 2 5 0.385
2018-19 Colby D3 NESCAC FR 13 3 2 5 0.385
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2018-19 · Colby
+86.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
8%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22159
Forward overall
#1003
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2008-09
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2021-22
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Finlandia · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.