← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Maucieri Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-02-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Northern Lakes Lightning USHS-MN 22 8 4 12 0.545 0.0691 0.0724 0.1325 0.1387
2016-17 Breezy Point North Stars NA3HL 19 2 9 11 0.579 0.0727 0.0775 0.1828 0.1949
2017-18 Breezy Point North Stars NA3HL 45 26 19 45 1.000 0.1255 0.1274 0.3157 0.3205
2018-19 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 57 16 23 39 0.684 0.1317 0.1270 0.4315 0.4162
2019-20 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 60 16 39 55 0.917 0.1765 0.1765 0.5781 0.5781
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Saint John's D3 MIAC JR 26 3 2 5 0.192
2021-22 Saint John's D3 MIAC SO 25 5 9 14 0.560
2020-21 St. Thomas D3 CCHA FR 5 2 2 4 0.800
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.80
2020-21 · St. Thomas
+635.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24797
Forward overall
#1252
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2015-16
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2016-17
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.