← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Maucieri Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-02-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Northern Lakes Lightning USHS-MN 22 8 4 12 0.545 0.1468 0.1537 0.1325 0.1387
2016-17 Breezy Point North Stars NA3HL 19 2 9 11 0.579 0.0698 0.0744 0.1829 0.1950
2017-18 Breezy Point North Stars NA3HL 45 26 19 45 1.000 0.1205 0.1223 0.3159 0.3207
2018-19 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 57 16 23 39 0.684 0.1936 0.1867 0.4311 0.4158
2019-20 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 60 16 39 55 0.917 0.2593 0.2593 0.5776 0.5776
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Saint John's D3 MIAC JR 26 3 2 5 0.192
2021-22 Saint John's D3 MIAC SO 25 5 9 14 0.560
2020-21 St. Thomas D3 FR 5 2 2 4 0.800
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.80
2020-21 · St. Thomas
+480.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19339
Forward overall
#743
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Becker · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2007-08
0.621 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Northland · 2006-07
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.