| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Muskegon Lumberjacks | USHL | 58 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.069 | 0.0407 | 0.0444 | 0.2072 | 0.2258 |
| 2015-16 | Muskegon Lumberjacks | USHL | 55 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 0.236 | 0.1395 | 0.1456 | 0.7100 | 0.7408 |
| 2017-18 | Sarnia Sting | OHL | 16 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.188 | 0.1085 | 0.1012 | 0.4818 | 0.4493 |
| 2018-19 | Sarnia Sting | OHL | 66 | 17 | 38 | 55 | 0.833 | 0.4821 | 0.4268 | 2.1412 | 1.8956 |
| 2023-24 | Iserlohn Roosters | DEL | 37 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0.162 | 0.4055 | 0.4623 | 1.3752 | 1.5680 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Michigan State | D1 | BigTen | SO | 26 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.192 |
| 2016-17 | Michigan State | D1 | BigTen | FR | 35 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.086 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.