← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mitch Eliot Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-02-06 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Iserlohn Roosters · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 58 0 4 4 0.069 0.0407 0.0444 0.2072 0.2258
2015-16 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 55 5 8 13 0.236 0.1395 0.1456 0.7100 0.7408
2017-18 Sarnia Sting OHL 16 2 1 3 0.188 0.1085 0.1012 0.4818 0.4493
2018-19 Sarnia Sting OHL 66 17 38 55 0.833 0.4821 0.4268 2.1412 1.8956
2023-24 Iserlohn Roosters DEL 37 1 5 6 0.162 0.4055 0.4623 1.3752 1.5680
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Michigan State D1 BigTen SO 26 2 3 5 0.192
2016-17 Michigan State D1 BigTen FR 35 0 3 3 0.086
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2016-17 · Michigan State
-13.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2016-17
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2015-16
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.