← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aleksi Ainali Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-12 Country: Finland
Signed Professionally
Nybro Vikings IF · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 HIFK U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 31 8 15 23 0.742 0.4021 0.3918 1.1220 1.0933
2014-15 Janesville Jets NAHL 33 3 9 12 0.364 0.1336 0.1310 1.5017 1.4247
2015-16 Jokerit U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 49 17 50 67 1.367 0.7411 0.6495 2.0678 1.8123
2016-17 Sport Liiga 27 4 7 11 0.407 1.0185 1.2615 3.5021 4.3375
2017-18 Sport Liiga 59 9 22 31 0.525 1.3135 1.5366 4.5164 5.2834
2018-19 Sport Liiga 45 15 16 31 0.689 1.7222 1.9502 5.9219 6.7060
2019-20 Sport Liiga 58 7 19 26 0.448 1.1207 1.1207 3.8536 3.8536
2020-21 KooKoo Liiga 53 6 20 26 0.491 1.2265 1.2265 4.2172 4.2172
2021-22 KooKoo Liiga 48 8 7 15 0.312 0.7812 0.7332 2.6863 2.5214
2022-23 Kristianstads IK Allsvenskan 49 14 14 28 0.571 1.4285 1.2586 5.3608 4.7231
2023-24 Nybro Vikings IF Allsvenskan 52 7 8 15 0.288 0.7212 0.6160 2.7067 2.3118
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA FR 18 0 4 4 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.38
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2016-17 · Alaska Anchorage
-41.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1672
Forward overall
#85
Forward born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2024-25
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.