IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Griffin Luce Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-03-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 37 0 2 2 0.054 0.0402 0.0408 0.2019 0.2049
2015-16 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 64 3 8 11 0.172 0.1278 0.1237 0.6414 0.6207
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Michigan D1 BigTen SR 35 0 4 4 0.114
2018-19 Michigan D1 BigTen JR 35 1 3 4 0.114
2017-18 Michigan D1 BigTen SO 34 1 2 3 0.088
2016-17 Michigan D1 BigTen FR 27 1 2 3 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2016-17 · Michigan
+29.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17049
Defenseman overall
#2540
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Steven Santini
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Hamilton
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Miami (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Josh Couturier
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Boston College (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Wolanin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Dorantes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Weber
Aurora · 2017-18
0.821 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Marlon Gardner
Neumann · 2004-05
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Miller
St. Scholastica · 2006-07
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.