IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ken McLean Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-06-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New York Apple Core EHL 43 15 28 43 1.000 0.3519 0.3876 0.4903 0.5400
2015-16 New York Bobcats EHL 35 14 26 40 1.143 0.4022 0.4253 0.5604 0.5926
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Manhattanville D1 — SR 22 19 11 30 1.364
2019-20 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 22 19 11 30 1.364
2018-19 Manhattanville D1 — JR 31 10 16 26 0.839
2018-19 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 31 10 16 26 0.839
2017-18 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 25 4 12 16 0.640
2016-17 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 8 0 5 5 0.625
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2016-17 · Manhattanville
+78.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9747
Forward overall
#446
Forward born in 1997
#103
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Grant Besse
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Montgomery
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha
0.35 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Steman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Drew Smolcynski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Hawkins
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steve Schroeder
Norwich · 2006-07
0.742 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Richard McCartney
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Botten
SUNY Oswego · 2010-11
1.133 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.