IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ken McLean Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-06-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New York Apple Core EHL 43 15 28 43 1.000 0.2310 0.2544 0.4893 0.5389
2015-16 New York Bobcats EHL 35 14 26 40 1.143 0.2640 0.2792 0.5592 0.5913
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Manhattanville D1 UCHC SR 22 19 11 30 1.364
2019-20 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 22 19 11 30 1.364
2018-19 Manhattanville D1 UCHC JR 31 10 16 26 0.839
2018-19 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 31 10 16 26 0.839
2017-18 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 25 4 12 16 0.640
2016-17 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 8 0 5 5 0.625
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2016-17 · Manhattanville
+171.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10387
Forward overall
#472
Forward born in 1997
#103
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Jarrid Privitera
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Vermont (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Shuart
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nate Arentz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alex Rauter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Cornell (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nikolas Olsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steve Schroeder
Norwich · 2006-07
0.742 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Oliver Flynn
Amherst · 2021-22
1.059 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Ryan
SUNY Oswego · 2021-22
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.