IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Ryan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-10-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 WB/Scranton Knights USPHL-Premier 40 17 12 29 0.725 0.0976 0.1028 0.2468 0.2599
2022-23 WB/Scranton Knights USPHL-Premier 44 35 38 73 1.659 0.2233 0.2241 0.5648 0.5669
2023-24 — NCDC 53 22 31 53 1.000 0.2818 0.2710 0.8096 0.7787
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 27 9 8 17 0.630
2024-25 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 22 3 10 13 0.591
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2024-25 · SUNY Oswego
+173.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17662
Forward overall
#698
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andy Nelson
Bowdoin · 2002-03
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cullen Kane
Lake Forest · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Cuce
Elmira · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.