IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Oliver Flynn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Loomis Chaffee NE-Prep 28 3 2 5 0.179 0.0359 0.0359 0.0817 0.0817
2020-21 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 31 5 12 17 0.548 0.2236 0.2236 0.4388 0.4388
2021-22 Loomis Chaffee NE-Prep 25 10 4 14 0.560 0.1126 0.1126 0.2561 0.2561
2022-23 — USHL 58 8 12 20 0.345 0.2034 0.1944 1.0346 0.9890
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Amherst D3 NESCAC JR 20 6 6 12 0.600
2024-25 Amherst D3 NESCAC — 17 4 14 18 1.059
2024-25 UConn D1 HockeyEast — 8 1 0 1 0.125
2023-24 UConn D1 HockeyEast — 23 1 1 2 0.087
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2023-24 · UConn
-37.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25409
Forward overall
#1412
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Micale
Buffalo State · 2022-23
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Stephens
SUNY Geneseo · 2001-02
1.077 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Omar Mullan
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2012-13
1.286 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.